In recent weeks, there have been notable court rulings that deserve our attention, and some of the comprehensive accounts are featured in this edition. Amid the COVID pandemic, while mainstream news outlets engaged in mockery and name calling, our commitment led us to continued research and discussions with medical professionals. We stood firm against the derogatory labels and negative rhetoric aimed at those of us who approached the situation critically, rather than blindly following the narrative.When did seeking input from experts on the frontlines become "extremist" or "dangerous"? When did questioning governmental actions, particularly as journalists, become inappropriate? This inclination to question is a fundamental aspect of our role. An example that resonates is a local doctor
